Course: Rights Based self directed support.
Commissioners: Local Authority.
Target group: Care Managers, OTs and enablement staff.
Criteria: Unsatisfactory (U) , Satisfactory (S) , Good (G) , Excellent (E)

Trainer

Knowledge level: G = 5 , E = 9, Unanswered =

Content (exercises, practical work): Good = 12 E = 2 Unanswered =

Content of course: G = 11 E = 3

Pace of course: G = 10, Very Good = 1 E = 1 Unanswered = 1

Length: S = 1 G = 10 , Very Good = , E = Unanswered = 2
Breaks (15 min) too long.

Relevance to participants - how will learning be used?:

• As a duty to offer it is good information to have for screening new referrals and giving existing clients info.
• Very relevant, I will use this when working to support team members decision making.
• To have a better understanding of how the rights [impact services]
• Should influence the future in supporting my client’s rights
• Appreciation of the change from independence and choice to rights based independent living and responsible citizenship.
• SDS
• To add greater awareness to decision making.
• To have an understanding of how [local authority] wishes to provide services in the future.
• Will help with transformation forward of role.
• When SDS is implemented
• Will use this information to inform clients and others about their rights under SDS
• Extremely relevant particularly at this point in time.
• Very relevant considering what is happening within [local authority]
• This course will help with my day to day enquiries I deal with.

Most relevant:

• Human and civil rights
• All of it.
• Very interesting course
• Everything on this course was useful.
• All elements useful.
• All of it.
• Implementation of SDS
• A worthwhile course to attend.
• All of it.
• All
• All of it.
• All
• Linking SDS to Acts.
• Legal changes and shift in thinking.
• Whole day
• The up to date legal position on the rights issues.

Other:

Good course
It was useful to have ‘hands on’ info from Louise.
This should be mandatory training for all staff - even if it is tailored towards different groups, enablement staff to high level managers should attend.
Food for thought, thank you.

Tags training | personalised support

Course: Rights Based self directed support.
Commissioners: Local Authority.
Criteria: Unsatisfactory (U) , Satisfactory (S) , Good (G) , Excellent (E)

Trainer

Knowledge level: G = 3, E = 12, Unanswered = 1

Content (exercises, practical work): Good = 6 E = 9 Unanswered = 1

Content of course: G = 7 E = 9

Pace of course: G = 9, Very Good = 2 E = 4, “Good pace for understanding.”

Length: G = 6, Very Good = 2, E = 4 Unanswered = 1
“Sufficient”.
“Could have been longer”.
“ Suitable - can build up knowledge on other courses”

Relevance to participants - how will learning be used?:

• Understanding of SDS
• Re-ablement training.
• Ensure concepts integrated within training.
• Mandatory Course
• Louise is very knowledgeable in her role and expertise in social model of disability and SDS.
• Better understanding of SDS and Rights
• It will underpin some of the training I will be delivering on support planning and SDS.
• Daily use
• Extremely relevant because of the new directives coming into place this year.
• Given me a better understanding of the underpinning of rights to SDS.
• This course is very relevant in view of all the changes in SDS.
• The training today will fit perfectly wit the changes being undertaken by social services.
• Mandatory - require an understanding of SDS and how to use this / how it will be applied.
• Of great value in the new integrated way of working
• Lots to think about in how we can ensure that the individual is really at the centre of our support planning.
• This will be valuable in the changing roles as SDS is introduced. Thought provoking.

Most relevant:

• Meaning of SDS
• Case Studies linking rights to the new agenda for SDS
• Presentations and case studies.
• All x 3
• Very relevant - will share with colleagues valuable content in handouts.
• Group exercises and studies.
• Very impressive
• All of them but very good / useful to be reminded of disability rights timeline.
• Very useful
• All relevant and beneficial
• Found the course excellent - could maybe have had a second day.
• All information useful and can be taken forward.
• All - interesting power point presentation. Handouts and information pack nicely presented.
• I found the whole day interesting, stimulating. Hopefully will help my practice in the future.
• Working communicating with other team member - learnt a lot today.
• Excellent day.
• Emphasising the importance of really listening and focusing on outcomes.
• Found the general discussion valuable. The legal aspects particularly. Time-line very useful.

Tags personalised support

Why is there no course feedback recently?


Louise has been working on behalf of ECDP in providing training for Essex County Council around self-directed support since July. We are unable to reproduce this feedback on our website.


Can I still commission a course with you directly?

Yes, Louise still runs courses, workshops and similar as a freelance consultant and trainer.

Tags Individual budgets | personalised support | putting people first

Commissioner: London Borough of Croydon
Course: Direct Payments- Policy and Procedure
Delegates: 16 - 11 responding.
Trainer: Louise Watch / IforI

Tags direct payments | personalised support

Commissioner: London Borough of Croydon
Course: Direct Payments- Consent and Management
Delegates: 14
Trainer: Louise Watch / IforI

Tags direct payments | personalised support

Commissioner: London Borough of Croydon
Course: Direct Payments- Making and Exploring.
Delegates: 13
Trainer: Louise Watch / IforI

Tags direct payments, personalised support

Commissioner: External to IforI.
Course: Disability Equality and the DDA
Delegates: 11
Trainer: Louise Watch / IforI

Feedback:

1. Was the course aimed at the right level for you?


2. Was the course content presented in a clear and understandable way?


3. Were all course aims met?


4. Are there any other topics you would have liked to see covered on the course?
Part 1 DDA in more detail


5. Were the teaching methods used appropriate?


6. Were handbooks/ handouts of a high standard?


7. Were people on the course treated fairly and equally?


8. Were sessions well timed, e.g. to allow time for feedback and questions?


9. Was/were the tutor/s able to answer questions satisfactorily?


10. Were teaching materials relevant and up to date?


11. Has the course given you greater understanding of Disability Equality issues?


12. Did the course meet your expectations?


13. Overall how would you evaluate the course?

Tags disabled | equality | training